Ai
Beauty
Biotech
Business
City
Clothing
Communication
Construction
Education
Energy
Entertainment
Family
Food
Gadgets
Government
Home
Human
Medicine
Nature
Privacy
Robots
Society
Space
Sport
Threats
Transport
Work

Food: an option for the lazy, but fearless

For those who do not want to bother with cooking and consider it a waste of time, there is an alternative option. Photosynthetic algae symbionts, which provide humans with most of their required nutrients, are implanted under the skin. Since people produce heat, regardless of the time of year and temperature on the street, they can produce food under their own skin all year round, combining a farm and a restaurant inside themselves, easily and effortlessly!

I agree
84
I don't agree
43
Connor Franchise that cannot be done, it's impossible. 19 Oct 2019
Dawid Byrski Thats impossible... 04 Oct 2019
Batuhan İnsanların çoğu bu tarz riskli bir işe girmek yeerine normal bir şekilde yemek yemeyi daha doğru buşup tercih edeceklerini düşünüyorum. 19 Sep 2019
Track7 In theory, it will not work. 11 Jun 2019
Dragoncat I don't understand how people making heat factors into photosynthesizing food, since photosynthesis requires light, not heat, but okay, maybe i don't understand something. Also nano-tech would probably make installing it easier, so no need for it to be implementation at before birth, or a painful surgery, just a pill with microscopic bots, though the argument about energy needs is quite valid, since the body definitely cant sustain you on just photosynthesis. 04 May 2019
Backtospawn True self-sustainability with this is not possible. The amount of calories needed by a human daily is much higher than what you can get from photosynthesis from his whole body surface. Even if you were completely covered, naked and outdoors all day it wouldn't be enough. The rate at which photosynthesis works is good enough for plants since they don't move and their caloric needs are low but for animals it doesn't work. 20 Apr 2019
zheling wow 22 Mar 2019
Peter Of couse not 18 Mar 2019
Victor Muraviev Unlikely to be seen implemented into already existing humans by 2050, however, new genetically engineered humans with this are likely to occur sooner. This seems like an awesome thing to have! 16 Mar 2019
Mon Definitely don't think we'll see this by 2050. The cost alone of a self-sustaining augmentation in mass production with limited damage control would be crippling. 16 Mar 2019
Azamuddin Agree about that 23 Feb 2019
DJ DRAGON I completely agree, but it would be painful and costly. 06 Feb 2019
lee1733123 of couse 06 Feb 2019